Free Thought

Martin Niemöller, a German Lutheran pastor, wrote this post-World-War-II confessional:

First they came for the Communists, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a Communist

Then they came for the Socialists, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a Socialist

Then they came for the trade unionists, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a trade unionist

Then they came for the Jews, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a Jew

Then they came for me, And there was no one left, To speak for me

May the time never come when we write this confessional:

First they came for the Deplorables, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a Deplorable

Then they came for the journalists, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a journalist

Then they came for the supporters of President Donald J. Trump, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a supporter of President Donald J. Trump

Then they came for the Founding Fathers, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a Founding Father

Then they came for the Whites, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a White

Then they came for the Jews, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a Jew

Then they came for the children, And I did not speak out, Because I was not a child

Then they came for the voters, And I did not speak out, Even though I was a voter

Then they came for me, And there was no one left, To speak for me

Politicians tell us that they have to keep secrets from us to protect National Security.  Certainly that often is true.  Sadly and scarily, it’s sometimes not true — sometimes they keep secrets from us to protect themselves against us.  How can we distinguish when they classify documents to protect our nation, as opposed to when they classify documents to protect themselves against us?

What is National Security?  Is it security for our nation, or is it security for our government against us?  What is our government?  Isn’t our government “of the people, by the people, for the people”?  Isn’t our government us?

Who gets to decide the answers to these questions?  Politicians don’t discuss these questions with us.  They simply declare National Security, without further discussion.  When we find out that their declaration was to protect themselves against us, they say “I take full responsibility”, pardon themselves, and move on.

Sometimes they embark on a path to destroy the person who informed us that their declaration of National Security was to protect themselves against us.  They call the person a traitor.  They go for the jugular, against the person who informed us that their declaration was not really to protect our nation.

Disclosing National Security secrets is treason.  Disclosing the fact that politicians fraudulently use the National Security label to protect themselves against us is not treason — it discloses treason.  The problem we face is this: How can we know who the traitor really is?  Is the traitor the person who discloses the fraud, or are the traitors the politicians who commit the fraud?

Fair-minded patriotic Americans struggle with these questions.  The more we trust and respect our government, the less we worry about these questions.  The less we trust and respect our government, the more we worry about these questions.

Trust and respect are the basis of government.  Without trust and respect, government is not “of the people, by the people, for the people”.  Without trust and respect, government is nothing more than a Ruling Class.  When a Ruling Class declares National Security, the people who it Rules sometimes have good reason to doubt or disbelieve.

In recent history, four names stand out: Daniel Ellsberg, Chelsea Manning (formerly known as Bradley Manning), Julian Assange, and Eric Snowden.  They all disclosed documents that politicians had classified as National Security secrets.

Daniel Ellsberg disclosed documents that politicians had classified as National Security Secrets — documents known as the Pentagon Papers.  The New York Times and The Washington Post published the Pentagon Papers.  The Supreme Court gave its okay to the publication.  The Pentagon Papers informed us that politicians sent 58,000 of our loved ones to die in the Vietnam War, based on lies by our politicians.  Would you label anyone as a traitor?  If so, who?

Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, and Eric Snowden did exactly what Daniel Ellsberg did.  Each of them individually and unilaterally took it into their own hands to disclose documents that politicians had classified as National Security secrets.  They apparently did it for exactly the same reason that Daniel Ellsberg did it — because they knew politicians fraudulently classified the documents as National Security secrets in order to protect themselves against us.  We don’t yet know this to be true, but, with each passing day, it appears more and more likely to be true.

With each passing day, our level of trust and respect for our government inches downward.  With each passing day, our level of trust and respect for Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, and Eric Snowden inches upward.

In a September 21, 2020 article published on the website antiwar.com, it’s been reported that a group of more than 160 “heads of state, congressional members, diplomats, and lawmakers from all across the globe” endorsed a letter calling for the United Kingdom to free Julian Assange instead of extraditing him to the United States for trial.  Would you have endorsed a similar letter on behalf of President Richard Nixon, White House Counsel John Dean, or Attorney General John Mitchell?

Thomas Paine wrote “These are the times that try men’s souls.”  Sadly and scarily, those words ring true today.  America faces grave peril, when we aren’t sure who the traitors are.  America’s ship needs to be righted, and we know who has to do it.  We have to do it.

In his post-World-War-II confessional titled “First they came for …”, a German Lutheran pastor named Martin Niemöller poignantly observed that, when good people don’t speak out against hate, there will be nobody left to speak out for them when hate knocks on their door.

On its website dailymail.com, the Daily Mail published an article titled “Palestinian immigrant owner of Minneapolis grocery chain slams cancel culture after he lost $5M in contracts and laid off 69 staff when BLM targeted him for his daughter’s racist teenage tweets”.  The article is dated June 9, 2021.  The URL where the article can be found is https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9668937/Palestinian-immigrant-owner-grocery-chain-Minneapolis-rails-against-cancel-culture.html.

The article is recent proof that Martin Niemöller should not be ignored.  It’s recent proof of the irony of hate.

At first blush, the title of the article tends to make readers feel sympathetic for a Palestinian immigrant from Kuwait named Majdi Wadi, who was victimized by Black Lives Matter.  Upon reading the article, however, questions arise (if the article is accurate):

• Majdi’s daughter Lianne Wadi tweeted “Top 3 races you wish to eliminate.  Ready, go!  Jews, blacks, and the fats.”  Question: How is it that Majdi raised a daughter who hates Jews and Blacks?
• Lianne joined Black Lives Matter.  The article doesn’t say Lianne participated in shooting retired police chief David Dorn, in burning a Minneapolis police station, or in throwing Molotov cocktails into police cars.  However, the article does say she flew BLM banners from Majdi’s stores, donated food supplies from Majdi’s stores to BLM, and joined BLM in their marches on the streets.  Question: How is it that Majdi raised a daughter who hates everyone BLM hates?
• Question: Did Majdi really think that hate never would knock on the door of a Palestinian immigrant?

Martin Niemöller failed to help Majdi raise a daughter who does not hate.  May the irony of his failure be a lesson to every parent.

Hearing Kate Smith sing “God Bless America” gives Americans goosebumps.  Hearing Pastor Jeremiah Wright preach “God Damn America” gives other Americans goosebumps.  The difference between those Americans is no less stark than the difference between light and darkness.

“God Bless America” is well documented:

• Our Founding Fathers, in our Constitution, preached the purpose of the United States is “to form a more perfect Union”.  America was full of dire shortcomings even from its beginning, but it’s purpose always has been “to form a more perfect Union”.
• America, in the 13th Amendment to our Constitution, preached that slavery is unacceptable: “slavery … shall not exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”
• America, in the 15th Amendment to our Constitution, preached that denying the right to vote based on race is unacceptable: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude”.
• America, in the 19th Amendment to our Constitution, preached that denying women the right to vote is unacceptable: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”
• President Harry S. Truman, in his Executive Order 9981 on July 26, 1948, preached that segregation in the United States armed forces is unacceptable: “there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed forces without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin.”
• The Supreme Court, in its Opinion on May 31, 1955 in Brown v Board of Education of Topeka, preached that “racial discrimination in public education is unconstitutional”.
• President John F. Kennedy, in his proclamation on September 29, 1962, preached that all persons demanding different treatment for Blacks and Whites at the University of Mississippi must “cease and desist” and must “disperse and retire peaceably”, and he sent the Army and the Mississippi National Guard to enforce his proclamation.
• Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in his “I Have A Dream” speech on August 28, 1963, preached that dividing America based on skin color is unacceptable: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
• America, in its Voting Rights Act of 1965, in more detail preached that denying the right to vote based on race is unacceptable: “All citizens of the United States who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in any State, Territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, municipality, or other territorial subdivision, shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections, without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude”.
• America, in its Fair Housing Act of 1968, preached that denying housing based on race or other category is unacceptable: “it shall be unlawful … to discriminate against any person in the terms conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection therewith, because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or nation origin.”
• America, in 2008 and 2012, preached that judging anyone by skin color is unacceptable: Americans twice elected Barak Obama President of the United States.
• Every President prior to 2021, on every Memorial Day, honored those who gave their lives for all of America.
• “God Bless America” gives Americans goosebumps.

“God Damn America” also is well documented:

• Pastor Jeremiah Wright, in a loud voice on April 13, 2003, preached his sermon to his congregation: “God Damn America”.  Among his congregants were Barak Obama and Michelle Obama, who chose Pastor Wright to officiate at their wedding and to baptize their daughters.
• Michelle Obama, on February 18, 2008, preached “For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country.”
• President Joe Biden, on January 7, 2021, nominated Kirsten Clarke to be the head of the Civil Rights Division in the Department of Justice.  Kristen Clarke preached “Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities”.
• America’s loudest voices preach, based on skin color and gender self-identity.
• America’s loudest voices preach to our children that Blacks and Whites are not equal.
• America’s loudest voices preach to the world that America is founded on, and controlled by, institutional racism and White Supremacy.
• President Joe Biden, on Memorial Day 2021, did not do anything to honor (and did not even mention) those who gave their lives for all of America.  President Joe Biden, in 2021, did fly Black Lives Matters flags and Pride flags on embassies and consulates around the world to honor those who preach that America is racist and sexist.
• “God Damn America” gives other Americans goosebumps.

America’s choice is as clear-cut as clear-cut can be: “God Bless America” or “God Damn America”.

We will honor the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., or we will call his legacy racist.

We will vote for politicians who teach our Black and White children that they are the same, or we will vote for politicians who teach our Black and White children that they are different.

We will remember our efforts “to form a more perfect union” with pride, or we will ban the books in which our efforts are remembered.

We will vote for politicians who sing with Kate Smith, or we will vote for politicians who pray with Jeremiah Wright.

Which path will we take?  That question is best answered with a question: Which path will you take?

Who are They?  That’s an easy question to answer.  They are not You.  They are people who imagine differently than You.

In 1971, people imagined America in the lyrics of John Lennon’s “Imagine”: No Heaven, Above us only sky, All the people living for today, No countries, And no religion.  Are those people They or You?

In 2020, people imagined America in the dogma of Black Lives Matter and Antifa, as articulated through murder and mayhem.  Are those people They or You?

In 2021, people are teaching our children as young as first grade to imagine that Blacks and Whites are not the same, that Whites have an obligation to apologize for being White, that people can be any gender and can masturbate, and that killing a baby one second before birth is an unalienable God-given right.  Are those people They or You?

You answers do not matter.  Why not?  That’s another easy question to answer.  Your answers do not matter, because They control America — not You.  They get to say what America is — not You.  They control your life and fortune — not You.  They control the schools that control your children — not You.

They write the laws — not You.  They write laws that say it’s a crime for You to use lies to trick people into giving You their money.  Why don’t They write laws that say it’s a crime for Them to use lies to trick people into giving Them their votes?  That’s another easy question to answer.  They don’t write those laws because those laws are not what They imagine for America.

At a Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin was asked “what have we got … a republic or a monarchy?”  He answered “A republic, if you can keep it.”  Although undocumented, it’s often repeated to explain what kind of America Benjamin Franklin imagined.  It is the same kind of America that President Abraham Lincoln imagined in his Gettysburg Address: an America “of the people, by the people, for the people”.  Do They imagine America as did Benjamin Franklin and President Abraham Lincoln?  Their words and actions clearly tell us that They imagine the exact opposite — that They imagine an America that They control without question.  Do You imagine America as did Benjamin Franklin and President Abraham Lincoln?

Close Your eyes and imagine America as You want it to be?  Open Your eyes and ask Yourself: “Is this America, as I imagined?”

They close Their eyes and imagine America as They want it to be, They then open Their eyes and begin implementing Their imagination by any means necessary.

Have You begun implementing Your imagination of America?

Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx stood in front of television cameras all day every day, seemingly for eternity, telling us this and telling us that, about following the science.

The coronavirus pandemic is no small matter.  It already has killed 4,000,000 people around the world, including 600,000 in America.

Fauci and Birx told us all day every day that we had to end our lives as we knew them to be, in order to save ourselves and the entire world.  We had to close our businesses, not go to work, not participate in public prayer, not educate our children, not wed, not attend funerals, not hold the hands of our sick and dying loved ones, and, believe it or not, we could not even fly on Thanksgiving to be with our family.  No, that would be unpatriotic and would be an unacceptable impingement on our nation’s public health.

Imagine our surprise at Birx epitomizing “Do as I say, not as I do.” She told America to limit Thanksgiving celebrations to “your immediate household”. The CDC told America “People who do not currently live in your housing unit, such as college students who are returning home from school for the holidays, should be considered part of different households”. Nevertheless, Birx secretly flew to Delaware to one of her vacation homes during the Thanksgiving holiday, and enjoyed herself with her husband, daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren. Imagine our surprise at her so-called explanation after her secret was exposed: “My trip to Delaware after the Thanksgiving holiday solely focused on preparing the property for a potential sale.” Imagine our surprise at Birx telling us that the rules the CDC and she impose on us Do Not Apply to anyone wealthy enough to own some vacation homes.

Imagine our surprise when we acquired significant evidence that might prove Fauci was the puppet-master behind the curtain who created the coronavirus, prevented doctors around the world from uncovering its origin, and, thereby, prevented doctors around the world from preventing coronavirus deaths as soon as possible.

Imagine our surprise when the people who control our lives and fortunes cancelled us, whenever we tried to ask questions about a possible horror story that might become known as Fauci-gate.

When we learned about Birx’s dirty little secret, she was sufficiently self-aware to recognize her gig was up.  She resigned, and she went into hiding.

Now, thanks to documents just obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, we acquired significant documentary evidence that might prove Fauci and the Devil are related.  The evidence might prove that Fauci knowingly or recklessly caused or permitted the 4,000,000 deaths.  We don’t know what the evidence ultimately will or will not prove, but we do know the newly obtained evidence appears worthy of investigation.

Fauci has not denied the authenticity of the newly obtained evidence.  He has taken to the media as a way to respond.  Fauci’s response is reported by Breitbart News on its website at breitbart.com, in a June 2, 2021 article titled “Fauci: I Was Never ‘Anti-Trump’ — His Supporters Don’t ‘Understand” Science Evolves”.  The article begins as follows:

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci said Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Deadline” that the supporters of former President Donald Trump “resent” him because they did not “understand” that comments and recommendations he made during the Trump administration have changed under the Biden administration because the data evolves with time.

Fauci said, “Yeah, I mean there is no doubt there are people out there, for one reason or another, resent me for what I did in the last administration, which was not anything that was anti-Trump at all. It was just trying to get the right information, to try and get the right data. What they didn’t seem to understand —I guess that it is understandable that they didn’t understand it— that science is a dynamic process.”

Unlike Birx, Fauci does not appear to be self-aware.  Instead of either providing a factual response to the evidence or keeping his mouth shut, Fauci chose to respond by calling President Donald J. Trump’s supporters stupid.

Really?  Is that the most intelligent, persuasive, informative response that Fauci’s got?  When did “follow the science” morph into calling President Donald J. Trump’s supporters stupid?

Is Fauci so extraordinarily un-self-aware, that he honestly thinks only President Donald J. Trump’s supporters question his infallibility?

Shame on Fauci for calling anyone stupid.  Taxpayers forked over a fortune to Fauci for his television pronouncements and his shared research with China, and taxpayers should not be paid back with name-calling.  We deserve better.

We deserve the truth.

“Unity” under Biden is reminiscent of the “Final Solution” under Hitler.  Below is the beginning of an article published by Breitbart News on its website at breitbart.com.

GOOGLE DIVERSITY CHIEF KAMAU BOBB: ‘JEWS HAVE INSATIABLE APPETITE FOR WAR AND KILLING’

by ALLUM BOKHARI  2 Jun 2021

Kamau Bobb, Google’s global head of “diversity strategy and research,” and senior director of the “Equity in Computing” research center at Georgia Tech, claimed that Jews have an “insatiable appetite for war and killing” in a 2007 blog.post on his personal website.

The post, titled “If I were a Jew,” slams Israel for an alleged “insatiable appetite for vengeful violence” and goes on to say “if I were a Jew I would be concerned about my insatiable appetite for war and killing in defense of myself.” The post was first reported on by the Washington Free Beacon.

In Mein Kampf, Volume I, Chapter X, Adolph Hitler became America’s Founding Father:

“In journalistic circles it is a pleasing custom to speak of the Press as a ‘Great Power’ within the State. As a matter of fact its importance is immense. One cannot easily overestimate it, for the Press continues the work of education even in adult life. Generally, readers of the Press can be classified into three groups:

First, those who believe everything they read;

Second, those who no longer believe anything;

Third, those who critically examine what they read and form their judgments accordingly.

Numerically, the first group is by far the strongest, being composed of the broad masses of the people. Intellectually, it forms the simplest portion of the nation. It cannot be classified according to occupation but only into grades of intelligence. Under this category come all those who have not been born to think for themselves or who have not learnt to do so and who, partly through incompetence and partly through ignorance, believe everything that is set before them in print. To these we must add that type of lazy individual who, although capable of thinking for himself out of sheer laziness gratefully absorbs everything that others had thought over, modestly believing this to have been thoroughly done. The influence which the Press has on all these people is therefore enormous; for after all they constitute the broad masses of a nation. But, somehow they are not in a position or are not willing personally to sift what is being served up to them; so that their whole attitude towards daily problems is almost solely the result of extraneous influence. All this can be advantageous where public enlightenment is of a serious and truthful character, but great harm is done when scoundrels and liars take a hand at this work.

The second group is numerically smaller, being partly composed of those who were formerly in the first group and after a series of bitter disappointments are now prepared to believe nothing of what they see in print. They hate all newspapers. Either they do not read them at all or they become exceptionally annoyed at their contents, which they hold to be nothing but a congeries of lies and misstatements. These people are difficult to handle; for they will always be sceptical of the truth. Consequently, they are useless for any form of positive work.

The third group is easily the smallest, being composed of real intellectuals whom natural aptitude and education have taught to think for themselves and who in all things try to form their own judgments, while at the same time carefully sifting what they read. They will not read any newspaper without using their own intelligence to collaborate with that of the writer and naturally this does not set writers an easy task. Journalists appreciate this type of reader only with a certain amount of reservation.

Hence the trash that newspapers are capable of serving up is of little danger–much less of importance–to the members of the third group of readers. In the majority of cases these readers have learnt to regard every journalist as fundamentally a rogue who sometimes speaks the truth. Most unfortunately, the value of these readers lies in their intelligence and not in their numerical strength, an unhappy state of affairs in a period where wisdom counts for nothing and majorities for everything. Nowadays when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor; the decision lies in the hands of the numerically strongest group; that is to say the first group, the crowd of simpletons and the credulous.

It is an all-important interest of the State and a national duty to prevent these people from falling into the hands of false, ignorant or even evil-minded teachers. Therefore it is the duty of the State to supervise their education and prevent every form of offence in this respect. Particular attention should be paid to the Press; for its influence on these people is by far the strongest and most penetrating of all; since its effect is not transitory but continual. Its immense significance lies in the uniform and persistent repetition of its teaching. Here, if anywhere, the State should never forget that all means should converge towards the same end. It must not be led astray by the will-o’-the-wisp of so-called ‘freedom of the Press’, or be talked into neglecting its duty, and withholding from the nation that which is good and which does good. With ruthless determination the State must keep control of this instrument of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the Nation.

* * *

in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.”

Humorists entertained us by asking: As Martians watch Earthlings walk behind their dogs and pick up their dogs’ poop, the Martians laugh and ask: Who is the master?

Humorists now entertain us by asking: As Martians watch countless Americans claim to love their country, and, at the same time, claim their country is systemically racist and is controlled in large part by politicians who are Nazis and liars and traitors and unworthy of a platform on Twitter, are the Martians laughing?

Humorists have a way of clearing the cloud of political-speak, and making the obvious obvious.  Steve, may he rest in peace, was fond of saying “Human beings are the some of the funniest people I know.”  He passed away before 2016.  Boy, did he miss an opportunity to entertain us!

Princeton University recently announced that its Classics Department cancelled its requirement for students on its “classics track” to have some proficiency in Greek or Latin.  Why?  Princeton explained that its purpose is “to address systemic racism”.  Really?  Doesn’t anybody at Princeton see the humor in believing that lowering academic standards is a good way “to address systemic racism”?  Are Martians laughing themselves silly?

Gun and illicit drug deaths are skyrocketing in our inner cities.  To address systemic racism, those in control of our inner cities defunded the police.  Martians are laughing themselves silly.

Republicans excitedly rant and rave all day every day about Democrats’ refusal to enforce existing immigration laws, and they endlessly publish exquisitely detailed proof that includes photographs and videos.  Democrats calmly pay no attention to what Republicans say, as they add countless soon-to-be-Democrats to the population of America.  Martians laugh their way into hysteria.

Unity, Whiteness, equity, LGBTQ+, racist, inner city high school diploma, academic freedom, and free speech are words that Martians don’t laugh at.  Why not?  Because, like countless Earthlings, Martians simply don’t know what those words mean.

Martians laugh at us all day every day — understandably.  In Steve’s wise words, human beings are some of the funniest people I know.

Our Founding Fathers had a silly idea: the Right To Vote.  They imagined that, when it comes to resolving political disagreements, the Right To Vote would be a guaranteed pathway to peace and democracy.

Boy, were they wrong!  Since 2000, Democrats and Republicans have often distrusted and contested presidential election results.  Democrat and Republican presidential candidates have litigated election results to the Supreme Court.  Democrat and Republican Senators and Members of Congress have filed formal objections to presidential voting results in many States.  And, yet, in spite of our government’s proven distrust of America’s Right To Vote, one good thing has prevailed — Democrats and Republicans alike have allowed We the People to vote, at least to some degree.

On the eve of Memorial Day 2021, that changed.  On that day, Democrats officially denied Texans the Right To Vote.  Democrats likely will describe it differently — they likely will describe it as an effort to protect Texans’ Right To Vote.  But calling a rose a tulip does not make the flower a tulip.

The Constitutions of the United States of America and Texas define the Right To Vote in Texas.  The Right To Vote begins with Texans having the Right To Vote for people to represent them in the Texas Legislature.  Legislators who ask for and receive the right to represent Texans in the Texas Legislature, have a duty to vote for or against Bills in the Texas Legislature.  Legislatures legislate — they don’t exist for any other reason.

When a legislator refuses to honor his promise to vote for or against Bills, isn’t that an impeachable offense?  When legislators conspire to prevent other legislators from voting for or against Bills, isn’t that, by definition, an impeachable and criminal offense?

On the eve of Memorial Day 2021, Hell froze over.  Texans had exercised their Right To Vote, by electing a Legislature comprised of Democrats and Republicans.  The Texas House of Representatives had honored Texans’ Right To Vote, by writing a Bill (a Bill about the Right To Vote).  The Texas House had scheduled a democratic vote on the Bill.  Then, on that fateful night, before the Texas House could vote on the Bill, the Democrats marched out of the House chamber, thereby denying the House a quorum, and thereby denying Texans’ the Right To Vote on the Bill (through their duly elected representatives in the House).

Can you imagine a civilized State or nation wherein one of the two major Parties refuses to allow the Legislature to vote on Bills written by the Legislature?  Of course you can’t— nobody can.  Not having the Right To Vote, is the definition of not having a civilized society.

On the eve of Memorial Day 2021, Democrats shouted “Rest In Peace” to Texans’ Right To Vote.